At Follen’s Annual Meeting on May 24, the group Follen Responds to Racism will offer a resolution, “Advancing Follen Church as an Antiracist Congregation.” The resolution affirms that Follen will commit to work proactively, internally and in the wider world, to support racial justice and the goals of the Black Lives Matter movement, to include hanging a banner.
FRR held two congregational meetings in May to give Follenites opportunities to explore and discuss the resolution.
- The May 4 meeting, “A Banner and Beyond: Follen Responds to Racism,” included the perspectives of Follenites Lex Johnson and Bernie Harleston, and an account by First Parish Arlington lay leader Lori Kenschaft about what happened when they put up a BLM banner, and more. See videos and notes from that meeting.
- The May 11 meeting was a moderated open dialogue about the resolution and an opportunity to consider what its implementation could look like. There are extensive notes from the May 11 meeting as well.
Below we offer some basics about the resolution and what it does, and does not, mean and, after that, links to further relevant information.
FAQs about the Resolution
The following FAQs and collection of sources at the end of this piece are designed to help people better understand what’s behind the resolution “Advancing Follen Church as an Antiracist Congregation.” and its implications.
If your question is not answered, please email firstname.lastname@example.org and someone from Follen Responds to Racism will get back to you.
The resolution calls for supporting the Black Lives Matter movement. What does that mean?
Over time, “Black Lives Matter” has evolved to have three meanings. It is a widely used slogan. There’s also the highly decentralized Black Lives Matter Network of about 30 chapters nationwide that was founded by activists Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi. And then there is the broad social movement that has spread in recent years and is focused on many aspects of undoing racial inequality. The last of these—the Black Lives Matter movement—is what the resolution refers to.
Saying we support the Black Lives Matter movement is the same as saying we support the current struggle of African Americans to achieve justice and equality.
Does the Black Lives Matter movement advocate violence against police officers or others?
No. Statements to that effect have come from conservative sources, such as Fox News, and may be intended to create a false dichotomy between supporting the movement and supporting the police. Black Lives Matter (the organization) and others have denounced those who say it supports violent action, and also denounced the killings of police officers.
How might the Lexington Police react to a Black Lives Matter banner?
Rev. Claire contacted Chief Corr and requested a meeting to inform LPD of the possibility of a banner and to ensure they understood what it would mean to us. He delegated two officers, who met with Rev. Claire and five members of the Follen Responds to Racism team in April. One officer noted that his initial overall reaction to Black Lives Matter was negative, but over the years has changed; he does not view it as anti-police. The other officer was against Black Lives Matter as an effective path to achieving racial justice. He thought other measures, such as ensuring children are raised with antiracist attitudes, were more effective. Both officers said that they applaud Follen’s efforts, would not view a banner as a negative statement about the LPD, and that they will support Follen in any way necessary, for example if the banner were vandalized.
What about other groups suffering from injustice?
The resolution does not mean to imply that other marginalized and oppressed groups don’t matter, or that Follen is a single-issue congregation. It’s assumed that other strands of social justice work will continue as before. It does mean that Follen will make intentional, proactive efforts in a way that it has not done previously to address the systemic devaluing of Black lives and the far-reaching legacy of slavery, a poison in our beloved country that harms all of us, white and black alike. And because race, class, gender, sexuality, economic status, and other factors are deeply intertwined, reforming the systems that uphold racism benefits all marginalized groups. It has come up often in discussions that after starting with a BLM banner there could be rotating messages about other issues that our faith calls us to address. This is not an either/or proposition.
What about the call for the end of US aid to Israel?
The resolution intentionally does not call for support of the “Vision for Black Lives: Policy Demands for Black Power, Freedom & Justice,” a sweeping platform developed by a collective of more than 50 organizations (mostly black -led) that calls itself the Movement for Black Lives. Even though the platform offers a powerful agenda for positive change, at least one section is highly controversial. It calls for a cut in, and domestic reallocation of, US foreign military expenditures, including an end to US aid to Israel, which it says makes the US complicit in supporting an “apartheid state” and the “genocide” of Palestinian people. That position is not pertinent to the resolution; we are not asking people to either endorse or refute it.
Why a banner?
Some people have expressed reservations about putting up a banner, which will include the words “Black Lives Matter.” The Rev. Louise Green speaks to that:
To display the sign, Black Lives Matter, is an act of cultural resistance, of public witness. This action is a symbol of something larger, and a spiritual practice as well—focus, attention, and steadiness. The aim and desire is to keep the spotlight on the complex set of issues affecting Black people in this country, dating from slavery through to [the present]. Not since the Civil Rights Era has there been such a sustained commitment to make broad change. Black Lives Matter is a statement about that renewed commitment, a vow to keep looking, watching, and struggling.
— Rev. Louise Green, Minister for Congregational Life,
River Road UU Church, Bethesda MD
A Few Resources
This is just the tip of the iceberg of the excellent articles, videos, and books available that are relevant to the resolution.
What is the Black Lives Matter movement?
Bernard, Jephie. “Black Lives Matter: the movement, the organization, and how journalists get it wrong.” Columbia Journalism Review. April 1, 2016.
Cobb, Jelani. “The Matter of Black Lives.” The New Yorker. March 14, 2016.
Pierce, Matt. “Why the term ‘Black Lives Matter’ can be so confusing.” Los Angeles Times. October 20, 2015.
Who We Are, a webpage on the national Black Lives Matter organization’s site, with links to three sections: About Us, Herstory, Principles.
What does the UUA say about banners?
The Unitarian Universalist Association has several pages on its website devoted to support for racial justice, including hanging a BLM banner. Each of the following pages has multiple links to sources of further information and reflection.
Banners Show Nationwide UU Support for Black Lives Matter Movement (examples from UU churches)
Also, two powerful UU World articles:
Sinkford, William. The Dream of White Innocence. UU World. Winter 2016.
Wiley, Ken. Five Ways to Support Black Lives Matter. UU World. August 10, 2015.
Also, here’s a powerful UU voice for racial justice:
Crass, Chris. Towards the “Other America:” Anti-Racist Resources for White People Taking Action for Black Lives Matter. Chalice Press. 2015. (free ebook)